Comments on Wednesday Lazy Linkingofficial state media for a secessionist republic of one2024-01-20T23:00:14Zhttps://radgeek.com/gt/2011/02/02/wednesday-lazy-linking/feed/WordPressBy: MBHMBHhttp://ubunturising.blogspot.com/tag:projects.radgeek.com,2009:lazy-linking/radgeek/20110202#comment-476512011-02-04T21:50:39Z2011-02-04T21:50:39ZDo you think it was a coincidence that he considered himself a federalist after revolution?
]]>By: Rad GeekRad Geekhttp://radgeek.com/tag:projects.radgeek.com,2009:lazy-linking/radgeek/20110202#comment-476472011-02-04T19:38:08Z2011-02-04T19:38:08ZI expect because he believed in the Federative Principle.
What exactly that meant to Proudhon may have changed over the course of his life, however. And it probably meant a different thing for the Proudhon of the 1860s than what it meant for, e.g., Bakunin or Kropotkin.
]]>By: MBHMBHhttp://ubunturising.blogspot.com/tag:projects.radgeek.com,2009:lazy-linking/radgeek/20110202#comment-476332011-02-04T13:01:11Z2011-02-04T13:01:11ZWhy did Pierre-Joseph Proudhon call himself a “federalist”?
]]>