This is of course immensely foolish and destructive of city life in Austin. One of the awful things about it is that the privileged band of goons going around doing it professes to be the “city of Austin,” in the living flesh, when in fact they are nothing but raiders mounting an armed attack on the city and its physical, technological and human transportation infrastructure.
Rad Geek Speaks: interview on Scratching By, Urban Homesteading, and Black-and-Red Markets, with John Bush of Rise Up Radio
Here’s a belated note from Libertopia 2013: while I was working the ALL table, John Bush of Rise Up Radio dropped by to talk, and very generously invited me to an interview about some of the themes in my article
Scratching By, and my talk at Libertopia, touching on structural poverty, political monopoly, the libertarian left, and grassroots mutual aid. Here’s the interview.
And by libertarian, we mean Anarchist. . . .
- I haven’t got a transcript yet; soon, I hope.↩
Here is some moderately good news about a ridiculously awful story, from Occupied Las Vegas:
Three years after a confrontation between Las Vegas police and a costumed street performer in front of The Venetian spawned a lawsuit, the Police Department has agreed to settle with Zorro for $105,000.
Jason Perez-Morciglio, who performs as Zorro on Las Vegas streets, and his brother, Sebastian Perez-Morciglio, sued in June 2010 after they said Venetian security officers kidnapped and detained them for more than an hour on Jan. 15, 2010, before kicking them off the property. The brothers also alleged that Las Vegas police officers illegally handcuffed and searched them at the resort.
These security guards handcuffed the brothers, searched their persons and belongings, demanded identification, and photographed them,the lawsuit documents said.
On Monday, The Metropolitan Police Department’s Fiscal Affairs Committee agreed to pay the brothers $105,000, something that Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak, who sits on the committee, thinks was the best option to avoid negative exposure for the department. The potential cost could have been significantly more, Sisolak said.
For the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, which provided general counsel for the brothers in the lawsuit, the impact of the settlement transcended monetary value.
The main thing in the case is that it was never about the money. It was about verifying again that the sidewalks in front of the hotels are a public forum, and the people have a right to First Amendment activity there,said Allen Lichtenstein, general counsel for the ACLU of Nevada.
According to Sisolak, accompanying the settlement was what he called a clearer and more definitive policy on how officers will handle street performers on the public sidewalks.
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2013-03-07: War on the Informal Sector (Cont’d) —
Neutron Bomb Urbanismand the State of Illinois vs. Square
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2009-02-28: War on the Informal Sector (Cont’d) —
Resale Roundupand local government vs. unfettered flea markets
- Charles Johnson (December 2007), Scratching By: How Government Creates Poverty As We Know It
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2007-09-15: Free Riders
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2009-02-19: How local government in Las Vegas and Clark County deals with the worst joblessness crisis in a generation
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2010-02-04: Against legalization (cont’d)
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2010-03-30: Scratching By (cont’d): The Government Land Cartel Vs. Costs Savings and Urban Living
- Charles Johnson, Rad Geek People’s Daily 2012-09-19: Well then I suppose they will lose their waffle cones as well as their principal.
Neutron Bomb Urbanism, from Stealth of Nations by Robert Neuwirth: in which Babatunde Fashola, arbitrary but
energeticState Governor of Lagos, Nigeria, possessed of a
infrastructure and housing projectsfor Lagos, cordons off and destroys 10,000 people’s homes in the shantytown neighborhood of Badia East. This comes on the heels of his government’s destruction of homes and displacement of more than one million people in
largely unannounced, government slum clearances[sic]. The same government has also demolished squatter communities in Makoko, razed street markets and criminalized street selling in the name of his gleaming visions and the socioeconomic cleansing that will scour
hiscity of poor people’s homes, lives and livelihoods.
You will be assimilated: State of Illinois vs. Technological Progress and Human-Scale Trade, from Cameron Scott at SocialTimes. The company behind the Square credit-card processor — one of the single most beneficial developments in years for small-scale sellers, ranging from storefront small businesses to informal hawkers and yard sales (I use it myself for ALL Distro tabling events — is being targeted with a cease-and-desist order and a threat of massive overkill fines from the State of Illinois, because they offer an unlicensed alternative to existing businesses for
transmitting moneyunder the State of Illinois. Since they haven’t complied with the right paperwork for a state license that they couldn’t possibly have known they needed, based on the State Government of Illinois’ arbitrary declaration that it will classify them in the category of
transmitting moneyrather than a
merchant payment processor, the State of Illinois will now shake them down for a no-doubt expensive and certainly legally burdensome licensing settlement, or else it will assess a fine of $1,000 per transaction, $1,000 per day, and 4× the transaction amount for continuing to process credit card payments for individuals and small businesses. As usual, the state’s mad insistence on compliance at all costs, with a maddeningly complex, largely arbitrary and in practice completely unpredictable set of bureaucratic requirements, means an assault on any disruptive technology or low-overhead upstart, even those that maintain a superficially respectable corporate front; the only way to survive is to call in yet more lawyers, fill out more forms, and to sink yet more time and money into making yourself indistinguishable from every other financial business in operation. Before the Law stands a doorkeeper, and you must be made to see that he is mighty; after all, the clash-of-the-titans
competitionbetween oligopolistic bureaucratically managed, government regulated finance industry has of course served us all so well that its business model must be locked in and secured against upstart alternative business models, at every opportunity, no matter the cost to low-overhead alternatives and infrastructure and services that community businesses and human-scale commerce have come to depend on.
- Charles Johnson (December 2007), Scratching By: How Government Creates Poverty As We Know It
- GT 2007-09-15: Free Riders
- GT 2009-02-19: How local government in Las Vegas and Clark County deals with the worst joblessness crisis in a generation
- GT 2009-08-28: The War on the Informal Sector (cont’d)
- GT 2010-02-04: Against legalization (cont’d)
- GT 2010-03-30: Scratching By (cont’d): The Government Land Cartel Vs. Costs Savings and Urban Living
- GT 2012-09-19: Well then I suppose they will lose their waffle cones as well as their principal.
Bureaucratic Rationality #7: the Louisiana State Health Department vs. Health and Adequate Nutrition in Louisiana
From occupied Louisiana, here’s how a state Health Department is forcing homeless shelters to destroy demonstrably safe and healthy meat because even though they accept the safety record of the slaughterhouse that processed it, they
don’t recognize the organization that donated it, and, even though venison is something that humans have subsisted on since before recorded history, it’s
not an approved meat source to be distributed commercially.
SHREVEPORT, La. (CBS Houston) — Louisiana’s State Health Department forced a homeless shelter to destroy $8,000 worth of deer meat because it was donated from a hunter organization.
KTBS-TV reports that the Shreveport-Bossier Rescue Mission lost 1,600 pounds of venison because the state’s Health Department doesn’t recognize Hunters for the Hungry, an organization that allows hunters to donate any extra game to charity.
We didn’t find anything wrong with it,Rev. Henry Martin told KTBS.It was processed correctly, it was packaged correctly.
The trouble began last month after the Department of Health and Hospitals received a complaint that deer meat was being served at the homeless shelter. A health inspector went out and told the homeless shelter that deer meat was not allowed to be served and that is had to be destroyed.
Although the meat was processed at a slaughterhouse (Bellevue) that is permitted by the Louisiana Department of Agriculture to prepare and commercially distribute meat obtained from approved farms, deer are not an approved meat source to be distributed commercially,the department said on its Facebook page.And because hunters brought the deer to the slaughterhouse, there is no way to verify how the deer were killed, prepared or stored.
Martin says that bleach had to be poured onto the meat in order to destroy it.
They threw it in the dumpster and poured Clorox on it,Martin told KTBS.Not only are we losing out and it’s costing us money, the people that are hungry aren’t going to get as quality of food, the hunter that’s given his meat in good faith is losing out.
While we applaud the good intentions of the hunters who donated this meat, we must protect the people who eat at Rescue Mission, and we cannot allow a potentially serious health threat to endanger the public,the Health Department stated.
Here, as everywhere, the Licensing State operates on the fundamental assumption that anything it doesn’t know about, must be
a potentially serious health threat, and the only way that it can know about anything is by checking whether or not the source has the right paper license, issued according to the state’s unilaterally dictated procedures. It doesn’t matter that literally nobody has been hurt and many people in desperate circumstances have been helped; it doesn’t matter you can show them there isn’t anything wrong with the meat; all that matters is that you can’t show them your papers. And so, rather than asking to just test some of the meat, or accepting the results of the health and safety tests that were already performed at the slaughterhouse, they sadistically insist that the food must be thrown away and rendered inedible with bleach, at tremendous expense and to the known detriment of the shelter and the health and nutrition of the homeless people who depend on it, so that they can ensure that the right forms are filled out and only officially licensed meat is served in the state of Louisiana. This sado-statist compliance hold on desperately-needed food, which insists on bureaucratic procedure and approving legal
recognition at the expense of demonstrable safety, is dignified as
protecting the people who eat at Rescue Mission from the food that they need to get by.
Bureaucratic rationality, n. The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may have something good in their life without your authorization.
- GT 2005-02-13: Bureaucratic rationality (Christmas turkeys)
- GT 2006-01-21: Bureaucratic rationality #2 (Government Issue edition)
- GT 2006-01-28: Bureaucratic rationality #3 (Indecent Exposure edition)
- GT 2006-04-10: Bureaucratic rationality #4 (Government Ownership of the Means of Reproduction edition)
- GT 2007-01-31: Bureaucratic rationality #5 (A Dream Deferred edition)
- Bureaucratic rationality #6 (Brings All the Boys to the Yard edition)
- GT 2008-12-22: Simple Solutions to Stupid Problems #2 (By the Power Vested In Me edition)
- Charles Johnson, Scratching By: How Government Creates Poverty As We Know It, The Freeman (December 2007)