I celebrated Roe v. Wade Day today by recalling the radical, anti-statist heritage of the pro-choice feminist movement. Lew Rockwell, on the other hand, celebrated it by reporting an anti-choice campaign endorsement for Chairman Ron’s Great Libertarian Electoral Revolution:
Today – the 35th anniversary of the Supremes’ Roe v. Wade usurpation – Norma McCorvey (Roe) has endorsed Ron Paul for president.
In passing, Rockwell describes the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade as a
usurpation. But a usurpation against whom?
The only thing that Roe does, legally speaking, is restrain the action of state governments, by forbidding them from passing certain kinds of abortion laws, on the claim that any such law conflicts with the requirements imposed on the several states by the United States Constitution. But depriving someone of a legal power can only count as
usurpation if the person or people you’re depriving had some kind of legitimate authority for you to usurp. And since when do
anti-war, anti-state pro-secession anarchists believe that state governments have any kind of legitimate authority at all?