Therefore, if I am a Libertarian Republican, it means that I can still be Republican and still support the better candidate, which in this case is Kerry.
]]>I would like to add that I am sympathetic towards techno-libertarianism because I see it as the only political movement capable of keeping IP from being monoplized by corporations, but I don’t think that libertarianism as a whole means really anything at all outside of the Western world.
There is absolutely no consideration for the problems of the third world where Republican forms of government are clearly superior. Trying to Democratize these nations is tantamount to annihilating them.
In fact, the very idea of a Libertarian party is preposterous.
Libertarianism is the opposite of partisanship. It is about being right at all costs.
I would also like to add that America is not really a democracy, it is an Anglo-Saxon oligarchy made to look like a democracy.
]]>I am concerned that the recent explosion of techno-libertarianism is turning into the Internet into an anarchist domain by which anglosaxon doctrinal systems are being spread through the entire world annihilating local language and culture.
I think democracy is fundementally wrong, albeit neccessary. And this is why I am Republican as opposed to Democratic.
What are your views on the American notion democracy and do you think it really a universally valid form of government?
If not, where today do you think it is valid and where do you think think Republican forms of government would be better?
]]>