Honestly, I don’t think we’re even of the same philosophy. Not if our cultural radicalism is an essential part of our integrated philosophic perspective.
]]>Do you have any positive reasons to believe otherwise, or is this just an esoteric subtext that a mere lay reader like myself can’t discern?
If, however, your defense is that DiLorenzo is just pandering to homophobia in an effort to discredit his enemies — rather than indulging in sincerely-felt homophobia himself — well, then, so what? Is that supposed to be better?
]]>Critic critique. thyself.
]]>There is so much revealing information to be unpacked from those 33 words, from the clarification that the dresses were women’s dresses to the quote marks around “Straussian” that don’t show up anywhere else. (“Flamboyant” people are contradicting themselves by being warmongers, perhaps?)
Thanks for drawing attention to this, RG.
]]>A Freudian (or rather, Straussian, ha!) slip?
]]>