Just a reminder: all that sound and fury from the anti-abortion movement on behalf of
Unborn Victims of Violence; all that sentimental law-making allegedly in the name of Laci Peterson and her yet-to-be-born son Connor; all that’s not really about protecting pregnant women from domestic violence. It’s not about punishing men who batter pregnant women, and it’s not about protecting children, either.
What it’s about is laying legal groundwork for punishing young women who seek abortions.
Test case: in Macomb County Michigan, prosecutors are now researching whether they can charge a 16 year old girl and her boyfriend with manslaughter for a desperate home-made abortion when she was four months pregnant:
Investigators said a pregnant 16-year-old girl allowed her boyfriend to beat her with a miniature baseball bat to cause a miscarriage, which may lead to criminal charges against the teens and one of their parents.
The girl estimated she was four months pregnant, said Macomb County Prosecutor-elect Eric Smith. Police said the boy’s mother helped transport the fetus to her home and bury it in the backyard.
Smith said the beatings weredone over a period of three weeks. It was done in an effort to terminate the pregnancy.
How dare they! Don’t they know that abortion is illegal in this country?
This is not a black and white area of the law. It is a gray area,added Smith.It is shocking the lengths these two teens went to terminate the pregnancy.
I am shocked! shocked! to find that a desperate 16 year old would go to such lengths to have an abortion outside of official state-approved channels. Why in God’s name would she do that?
Under Michigan law, people under 18 need one parent’s permission to obtain a legal abortion.
Neither family knew about the pregnancy before it was terminated,Smith said.
A first-trimester abortion without complications costs about $300, Warren said.
If 16-year-olds feel that this is there only option, than we have really missed the boat on educating them about sexual health,Warren said.
This is a culture of life we’re building here, folks. And that means doing everything we can with pro-life laws to stop young women from getting abortions from a safe, medical provider. And throwing them in a pro-life prison when they finally make a desparate attempt to end the pregnancy at home without the aid of a doctor.
INDIO, Calif. A California teenager has been convicted of attempted murder for shooting his pregnant girlfriend inside a Riverside County abortion clinic.
The shooting left the 16 year-old victim a quadriplegic.
She testified during the trial that 17-year-old Jeffrey Fitzhenry told her before the shooting that she wasdepriving him of his unborn child.
The prosecutor told jurors he also threatened,If you take something of mine, I’ll take something of yours.
Apparently, he didn’t like the idea of her getting an abortion. Or rather, he was an abusive sociopath. He reportedly told her:If you take something of mine, I’ll take something of yours.
Except the fetus was in her body not his, and she’d be the one to deal with the health risks and potential complications, not him.
Now, you might think that it’s unfair of me to sit here pinning the actions of one abusive boyfriend on the anti-abortion movement as a whole—but how are Jeffrey Fitzhenry’s actions different in any salient respect from the legal action that
pro-life laws are pushing
pro-life prosecutors to take in Macomb County? Enforcing laws that stop young women from obtaining medical abortions means stationing armed men who are ready to shoot you in the neck to keep you from getting an abortion. Enforcing laws that punish women for getting an unauthorized abortion means using violence against young women who try to get one through other means. The fact that the abusive sociopath wears a suit and works in Congress does not make it any different. The fact that the shooting is done by men with badges does not make it any different. The fact that any complaints against the men who shoot you will be dismissed by men in black robes does not make it any different. The only difference is that Jeffrey Fitzhenry is only one sociopath, with only one woman as his target. The
pro-life state would be a sociopath with armies at its disposal, with all young women as its targets. (For more on the same topic, see GT 2004-03-08: April March.)
Jeffrey Fitzhenry didn’t care about life; he shot his ex-girlfriend in the neck because he wanted control over her body, and he wanted to take revenge when she didn’t comply. He is not pro-life; he is an abusive sociopath. And nothing less is true of the legislators, presidents, or prosecutors who use deceptive bills to enforcing a
culture of life at the barrel of a gun.