Via Sheldon Richman on Facebook, comes this story about political Progressivism.
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) emerged as one of the most notable progressive defenders of the National Security Agency’s sweeping surveillance programs on Monday when he expressed a “high level of confidence” that the federal government’s collection of phone and Internet data has been effective in thwarting terrorism.
I can assure you, this is not about spying on the American people,Franken told Minneapolis-based CBS affiliate WCCO. The junior Minnesota senator, who’s only been in the Senate since 2009, said he waswas very well aware ofthe surveillance programs and was not surprised by a recent slate of bombshell reports by both The Guardian and The Washington Post.
I have a high level of confidence that this is used to protect us and I know that it has been successful in preventing terrorism,Franken said.
–Tom Kludt, Al Franken Defends NSA Surveillance: It’s Not Spying, They’re Protecting Us
in TPMLiveWire (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)
Of course he has. Because he is privileged to be part of the
us that is being protected, not the
us that is being spied on. The reactions of many political Progressives to this scandal — including many political Progressives who had presented themselves for years as
civil libertarians — are outrageous; but they should not be even a little bit surprising. They are yet another illustration of why serious social change can never come about through electoral politics; because the only mechanism that electoral politics has for change is to make a different party into the governing party. But when a party becomes the governing party, the party that they belong to has always proved to be of far less practical significance than the fact that they are, or see themselves as, governing. Their first and last loyalty will never be to a professed set of principles or a party platform, but rather to the uninterrupted continuity of government, and the successful management of the core structures of state power. The first and last loyalty of the party in power in America will always be to power, both for their party and for the American government — not to the causes or the principles or the people that they claim to speak for.
- Rad Geek People’s Daily 2010-11-02: Don’t Vote
- Rad Geek People’s Daily 2008-10-31: View images tagged
- Rad Geek People’s Daily: Articles tagged
Change You Can Believe In
- Randolph Bourne, The State, § II ¶ 9:
The President is an elected king, but the fact that he is elected has proved to be of far less significance in the course of political evolution than the fact that he is pragmatically a king. . . .