The present anarchy of our commerce (cont’d)
Here's a pretty old post from the blog archives of Geekery Today; it was written about 14 years ago, in 2010, on the World Wide Web.
So, here is the latest on the Alliance of the Libertarian Left at the Bay Area Anarchist Bookfair.
First — I’d like to give a big shout-out to the three very generous donors who chipped in to cover all of the costs for the table registration fee and the shoestring-budget travel expenses from Las Vegas to San Francisco. Thank you! You’re awesome. Seriously.
Second. Along with the selection of booklets and buttons that we had at last year’s Bay Area bookfair, and last month’s bookfair in L.A., James Tuttle from Tulsa ALL will be bringing along some new literature from ALL and from Corvus. And Southern Nevada ALL will be bringing along a passle of new literature, including four new Market Anarchy Series zines and several new button designs. If you’re curious, or interested, we’ve added the new items to our distro page. If you need some literature and merchandise for your ALL local, or just want to pick some up for yourself, check it out — everything’s available either as an individual item or for discounted bulk orders. It’s a great way to get the word out; also a way that you can pick up some solid left-libertarian materials while helping us defray the costs of supplies and printing for the Bookfair.
Here’s a sampler of the new booklets and buttons we’ve got in at the Distro.
Market Anarchy #13: Libertarianism Through Thick and Thin Charles Johnson (2008) (Specially commissioned by James Tuttle of Tulsa ALL.) |
Government is Violence / think Anarchy for consensual alternatives [ALL] (1.5!!!@@e2;20ac;b3;) |
Market Anarchy #14: Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved Roderick Long and Charles Johnson (2005) (Specially commissioned by James Tuttle of Tulsa ALL.) |
Deporten a La Migra! [ALL] (1.5!!!@@e2;20ac;b3;) |
The Best of BAD Press: Tracts in Individualist Anarchism 1986–1999 BAD Press (2001) |
i don’t pay war taxes [ALL] (1.5!!!@@e2;20ac;b3;) |
MA15: Property to the People! Expropriate the Expropriators!
|
NO BORDERS / NO STATE [ALL] (1.5!!!@@e2;20ac;b3;) |
MA16: Liberty, Equality, Solidarity Charles Johnson (2008) (Specially commissioned by James Tuttle of Tulsa ALL. Ships on or after March 1, 2010.) |
Ralph Chaplin 1933) (Produced and distributed by Southern Nevada ALL for an ad hoc organizing committee of the IWW in Las Vegas.) |
Crypto Anarchy and Virtual Communities Timothy C. May (1994) |
Market Anarchy Zine Series: full print run 16 Market Anarchy zines for $1500 |
I’d like to take special note of a couple new items in the Market Anarchy series . There is, first, the most recent issue (#15), which is a reprinting of Karl Hess’s Where Are The Specifics?
. For those of you familiar with Rothbard’s (in)famous Confiscation and the Homestead Principle
(already part of the Market Anarchy series, as Market Anarchy #1: All Power to the Soviets!), this is the article by Hess that Rothbard was riffing on when he wrote that essay. (The two were first published together in a single issue of Libertarian Forum, along with a polemic against the government assault on People’s Park.) Since the two are of a set, to go along with All Power to the Soviets!
I gave the Hess booklet the title Property to the People! Expropriate the Expropriators!
Hess’s article is shorter than Rothbard’s, and raises a lot more questions where Rothbard aims for a specific answer (Hess asks what would become of General Motors in a free society; Rothbard tries to answer the question). But it’s notable, among other things, for Hess’s shout-out to militant reclaim-the-land movements in the Southwest U.S. / northeast Aztlan, and for the really excellent programmatic statements at the beginning, on the difference between the defense of individual property and freed-markets, on the one hand, and apologetics for actually-existing property claims and the typical business practices of state capitalists, on the other.
And, second, there is the upcoming issue (#16), which is — at long last — a reprint of my essay Liberty, Equality, Solidarity: Toward a Dialectical Anarchism, which will be freely available for reprinting with attribution at the end of February 2010. (As a result, the booklet ships on March 1 at the earliest.) It used to cost somewhere between $60 and $80 to get a printed copy of the essay; come March, it can be yours in an attractive booklet edition for only $1.75. The essay ranges pretty widely, from the anarchist case against limited government
to radical equality to the interconnection of struggles and thick conceptions of libertarianism to individualist anarchist engagements with radical feminism, the labor movement, and the great capitalist conflation controversy. Thus: The purpose of this essay is political revolution. And I don't mean a “revolution” in libertarian political theory, or a revolutionary new political strategy, or the kind of “revolution” that consists in electing a cadre of new and better politicians to the existing seats of power. When I say a “revolution,” I mean the real thing: I hope that this essay will contribute to the overthrow of the United States government, and indeed all governments everywhere in the world. You might think that the argument of an academic essay is a pretty slender reed to lean on; but then, every revolution has to start somewhere, and in any case what I have in mind may be somewhat different from what you imagine. For now, it will be enough to say that I intend to give you some reasons to become an individualist anarchist, and undermine some of the arguments for preferring minimalist government to anarchy. In the process, I will argue that the form of anarchism I defend is best understood from what Chris Sciabarra has described as a dialectical orientation in social theory, as part of a larger effort to understand and to challenge interlocking, mutually reinforcing systems of oppression, of which statism is an integral part—but only one part among others. Not only is libertarianism part of a radical politics of human liberation, it is in fact the natural companion of revolutionary Leftism and radical feminism.
(This booklet edition of Liberty, Equality, Solidarity was, incidentally, made possible by a generous commission from James Tuttle of Tulsa ALL.)
Anyway. If you’re there at the Bookfair, these items and some others will be out on the table for you to check out. If circumstances force you to be square rather than there, they are all available now through the Southern Nevada ALL Agitprop & Artwork Distro.
Enjoy!
Follow
Discussed at www.echoesandmirrors.com /#
Echoes and Mirrors » Daily Links:
In “Liberty, Equality, Solidarity: Toward a Dialectical Anarchism” are you writing in favor of Hegel’s dialectical synthesis or for Aristotle’s dialectic?
Anonymous,
The use of in the essay is mainly in response to Chris Sciabarra’s work in the trilogy. Sciabarra, in turn, (1) identifies his use of with Aristotle’s approach to intellectual inquiry, but (2) acknowledges that his understanding is also significantly filtered through Marx’s development of dialectics as a tool for understanding history and for radical social theorizing. There’s not much direct contact with Hegel in my use of the terminology, although there is some contact with what Marx made of Hegel. In any case, if you were curious, I’m not presenting Liberty, Equality, and Solidarity as any sort of thesis/antithesis/synthesis triad. (The view in the essay is that principles of Equality are the best justificatory grounds for demands for Liberty, and that the same principles also, considered in another light, justify a concern with Solidarity, hence linking anti-statism with a number of concerns historically associated with the revolutionary Left, and in particular with the anti-authoritarian, grassroots Left.)
Sciabarra actually assigns a wider range of meanings to than what I directly engage with in the essay (he uses it as a means of distinguishing thick from thin conceptions of libertarianism, but also scientific from utopian approaches to radical theorizing, evolutionary from reconstructive approaches to social transformation, contextually sensitive from acontextual modes of inquiry, immanent from transcendent critiques of social relations, and some other things besides. In my own esssay, most of what I have to say has to do with thick conceptions of liberty as opposed to thin, and with contextually-sensitive as opposed to acontextual modes of inquiry.
Hope that helps. In any case, in addition to the printed booklet, the essay will also be going up online on 1 March 2010, so hopefully there should be ample opportunity to see where it’s going soon.