Rad Geek People's Daily

official state media for a secessionist republic of one

Prohibition kills

Here's a pretty old post from the blog archives of Geekery Today; it was written about 18 years ago, in 2006, on the World Wide Web.

I saw this story splashed on the front page of the Detroit Free Press at the gas station this morning:

Teen’s life slips away in drug den

June 21, 2006

BY JIM SCHAEFER and KIM NORRIS
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITERS

Bloomfield Township teen Lauren Jolly clung to life for three hours after snorting a lethal dose of heroin in a Detroit drug house, but police say the man running the place wouldn’t allow anyone to take her to a hospital, the Free Press has learned.

After an ice bath and CPR failed to revive Jolly, 17, the night of May 24, the man, Donald Coleman, carried her to her car, police said. He allegedly then ordered another drug customer to drive Jolly elsewhere in Detroit, park the car and leave the body inside. Coleman gave the woman $30 to return by cab, police said.

But the woman, who is an admitted prostitute, instead took Jolly to St. John Hospital, where the Birmingham Groves High School junior was pronounced dead. When police arrived at the hospital, the woman lied and said she had found the girl passed out in a car near 8 Mile, police said.

— Detroit Free Press (2006-06-21): Teen’s life slips away in drug den

And what makes me so mad about this story is that I knew how it would end before I even read through it. Let’s set aside for a moment the currents (or riptides) of class issues implicit in this sort of front-page shocker — if you know how the suburb of Bloomfield relates to the city of Detroit, you’ll know what I mean. For now, I’d like to point out the way in which this girl’s death is immediately, unthinkingly used for a story about the heartlessness of drug dealers, and the narcs’ battle against the latest grave and gathering threat to the teenagers of the outer suburbs:

No one has been charged in connection with the teenager’s death, but federal and local investigations are continuing in the possible roles of both men and whether Jolly’s overdose was caused by a deadly mix of heroin and the painkiller fentanyl. Authorities have blamed fentanyl — which is many times more powerful than heroin — for at least 83 deaths in Wayne and Oakland counties this year.

… The investigation into Jolly’s death picked up steam over the weekend when state and federal officials spoke with several people connected with the drug house, including the prostitute, who told police she had lied earlier because she was afraid of Donald Coleman.

The woman now described going to the house on Keating to buy heroin and finding Jolly sitting unconscious in the dining room.

The woman told police that she learned that after Jolly took the heroin, Donald Coleman and others had put Jolly in the bathtub with ice cubes to try to revive her. Her wet clothes had been removed.

The woman said that the teenager eventually appeared to stop breathing. She and Donald Coleman then tried CPR, unsuccessfully, police said.

There were about eight people inside at the time, police said. Several people volunteered to take Jolly to the hospital before she died, but Donald Coleman wouldn’t allow it, police said.

… Heroin laced with fentanyl has appeared on the streets in cities from Chicago to St. Louis to Pittsburgh. It has drawn together local, state and federal law enforcement officials to fight it and even extended to Mexico, where a fentanyl lab was raided by Mexican authorities several weeks ago.

The growing threat also has gotten the attention of the Bush administration. Last week, Scott Burns, the deputy drug czar, attended a conference on fentanyl in Chicago.

— Detroit Free Press (2006-06-21): Teen’s life slips away in drug den

That’s right: it’s a scary world out there in Detroit, and you suburban parents had better keep an eye on your teenagers. The cops are looking out for them but they can’t do everything in the face of such a growing threat. The people pushing this stuff are the sort of heartless scum who would let a poor girl die of an overdose and try to dump the body rather than getting her medical attention.

It may very well be true that Donald Coleman is heartless scum. Some drug dealers are. But, even then, why would he try to stop the girl from being taken to a hospital? Many of his customers volunteered to take her in; Coleman even tried to save her life himself. But he refused to let her be taken to the hospital. Because he was afraid that if that happened, the cops would arrest him and send him to prison for dealing drugs.

If it were not for drug laws, and the corresponding threats of violence, Lauren Jolly would have received immediate medical care, and she might very well be alive today. It’s not drugs that killed her, or even drug dealers. It’s drug prohibition that made Coleman was desperate not to get the authorities involved. Lauren Jolly is dead because drugs are illegal and drug dealers are constantly under threat from the police.

And yet, even though it is only because of drug prohibition that she is dead, and even though the fact that Coleman was trying to avoid arrest is so obvious that it doesn’t even merit mentioning in the story, her death is still being exploited by the narcs and their propagandists in the local press as yet another opportunity to stir up fear about the dangers of drugs and the need for ever-tougher prohibition.

Once again, the pigs who all but murdered this girl will use the human cost of their own failures as the excuse for even more widespread and invasive powers.

12 replies to Prohibition kills Use a feed to Follow replies to this article

  1. freeman

    The drug war has been on a major killing spree in the Detroit area lately. I think there have been a few hundred deaths in the area this year from heroin mixed with fentanyl. In addition to the reason you cited as to why prohibition is ultimately responsible for her death, there is also the drug purity factor. Potencies of drugs like heroin are always different on the black market, and users never know if what they’re using is laced with something like fentanyl. That wouldn’t be the case if heroin was legal. This reminds me of an article I read back in the late 90s about the drug war and how about 80% of all drug overdose deaths were caused by drug laws.

    By the way, that Fentanyl stuff is mighty potent – 50 times more potent than morphine. My mom has a prescription for fentanyl patches and I put one on her last night. According to “the law”, I must flush the old patches down the toilet instead of simply throwing them away.

  2. Sergio Méndez

    I totally Agree, as usual Charles, but something that bothers me is HOW to fight against prohibition? Which strategy is necesary to persuade people about the lunatic character of the war against drugs?

  3. Lady Aster

    Sergio-

    (If I may be pardoned for intruding with my answer)-

    Change the culture! Here in San Francisco pot is de facto almost legal because its use is so socially accepted that police can do little to enforce their law (while tolerated medical marijuana clubs legalise much of the existing pot possesion). And full decriminalisation of marijuana would be be fairly easy if San Francisco could have an independent policy on drugs.

    If libertarians acted not only to oppose prohibition laws but also to change the cultural climate making those laws possible they would achieve far better results. If people througout the country came to see marijuana smokers as diverse human beings the way most people do here then the coercive laws would be meaningless and quickly obsolete.

    Libertarians, in my opinion, should shed their cultural neutrality and learn to identify with the liberation of those affected by unjust (coercive) laws. Libertarians could make a major blow for drug-users’ rights by staging well-publicised stone-ins in front of city halls and police departments. Libertarians could host sex workers as public speakers to demystify their lives and increase mainstream awareness of sex workers as human beings. Libertarians could, when discussing immigration, bring out the heroism of those who leave everything behind to seek a better life in a new country. Libertarians could tour gun shows with video cameras to introduce demonised gun-owners to liberals and leftists.

    This is the way most 20th century libertarian battles were won (usually not by libertarians). This is what knocked down Jim Crow, contraception and abortion laws (until recently), the sodomy laws, etc. People don’t become convinced on principle to tolerate the rights of those they despise. People learn to stop despising or fearing others and subsequently loosen their grip on the formerly despised rights.

    This is why libertarians must be supporters of openness and tolerance.

    Lady Aster

    (who is currently praying at the Church of St. Peter McWilliams)

  4. Sergio Méndez

    Lady:

    I agree that chancging the culture is a start.

    The problem for me is that I live in a far more conservative place than San Francisco: Colombia. So everytime I get engaged on a discusion on the war against drugs, it ends with “drugs are bad cause they finance terrorism” mantra (yet people fail to realize paramilitaries and guerrillas would actually be blown up economically by an eventual legalization) or “it may be a good idea but we must wait until the US aproves it!”.

  5. Eric

    I knew Lauren Jolly, I attended middle school and high school with her. She was my friend.

    There are drug laws for a reason. The drug laws are intended to prevent people from overdosing or starting a deadly drug such as heroin in the first place. Drug dealers are scum, they make tax-free dirty cash by slowly killing their customers. Shame on you for dehumanizing the situation.

  6. Sergio Méndez

    Eric:

    How did drug laws “prevented” Lauren overdose?

  7. Joshua Lyle

    Beg pardon, but you seem to be accusing others of “dehumanizing the situation”, while simultenously calling drug dealers “scum”, which seems to be both inconsistent and inaccurate, as RadGeek treated each of the involved persons as persons wheras you seem determined to dehumanize the drug dealers.

    Also, you claim that drug legislation is designed to prevent people from overdosing (which I am disinclined to grant) but that does not seem to be relevant to the analysis at hand. After all, if I punch you in the stomach with the intent of making you smile my noble intention does not absolve my responsibility for the negative consequences of my action, just as the intentions of legislators and police officers do not absolve them of their part in the death of your friend.

    Sorry for your loss.

  8. anon

    I can’t even believe some of things I am reading about this situation. Bring up the prohibition issue if this was a story about a kid who dealt a few too many bags of pot and got put in jail for it. I can’t believe a heroin issue that killed a 17 year old girl who had her whole life ahead of her is being blamed on prohibition.

    There is no way that heroin should be decriminalized. Name one person that can call themselves a good human being and still use heroin or sell heroin to anyone. The first thing they should be doing is getting help. Of course it is everyones choice of what they want to put in their own body, but blaming this situation on prohibition is ridiculous. A 17 year old girl is dead because of the terrible decisions she made and maybe even hanging out with the wrong crowd. But if this stuff wasn’t so readily available then this would not have even crossed her mind.

    I just wish with all my heart that this could have been prevented. If heroin was decrimnalized there would be more people trying to make a buck off of it, and more people dying because of it. I am all for decriminalzing marijuana, but this is heroin people.

  9. Rad Geek

    anon,

    If heroin were decriminalized, what would have stopped Lauren Jolly from being taken to the hospital and receiving the medical care that would have saved her life?

    Eric,

    There are lots of sleazy businesses out there that I’d like to see collapse from lack of customers. The tobacco industry, for example, are by and large callous, weaselly, death-dealing sleazebags. Alcohol abuse causes far more deaths every year than heroin abuse. But that’s no argument at all for threatening tobacco or alcohol execs with prison.

    Far less is it a reason for pretending that you’d looking out for the welfare of smokers or drunks by threatening them with prison.

    I’m very sorry about the loss of your friend. But you need to realize that the laws you are defending are not magical spells that automatically stop people from abusing drugs. They are commands, issued by the government, that will be enforced by men with guns and handcuffs against those who refuse to obey them. When people are threatened with violence they will react in some predictable ways; one of those ways is to go underground and try to avoid exposure. It’s only because of the threat of violence that drug dealers would ever do things like trying to stop customers from getting medical care in an emergency. If the narcs and their legal enablers don’t realize that their threats of violence might block Lauren from getting the medical care she needed, then they were wilfully blind. If they knew but did not care, then they need to shut up and stop pretending to care about the welfare of drug users.

    Also, I don’t care whether drug dealers pay taxes or not. Why would I? I try to pay as little in tax as I can, and if I could pay none at all I think that would be great.

  10. Morken

    Actually heroin is not that dangerous and addictive as widely believed. With regard to addictiveness it is similar to alcohol, see e.g. http://www.reason.com/0306/fe.js.h.shtml

· July 2006 ·

  1. Lady Aster

    I recently met a heroin user at our Las Vegas sex workers’ rights conference. (and no, contrary to stereotype, she was in this respect atypical of the conferencees) She was ‘out and proud’ with her heroin use and spoke strongly in favor of chasing the dragon during one of our breakout salons.

    Watching her, I don’t think she is spiritually profiting from her heroin use- I think she’s harming herself and is only functioning enough to take this unusual stance because her underlying personality is amazingly strong. But nevertheless I found myself much admiring her- she certainly carried the courage of her convictions and her spirit had a very unique kind of beauty. I am inclined to support her in her current heroin use because I would rather see someone following a passionate and rare belief which is wrong and preserve the precious capacity to follow beliefs which are passionate and rare. I certainly would think it a monstrosity for her to be jailed.

    I do think there are heroin users who are good human beings. Heroin is only concentrated opium, after all, and opium was widely used in various periods by wide sectors of the European and Asian intelligentsia. Great poetry has been written under opium’s influence (most famously, Coleridge’s Kubla Kahn). I was once under morphine for eight days straight in a Thai hospital, and I found the psychoactive effects very interesting. I have also known users of not only marijuana but crystal meth and cocaine whom I consider wonderful human beings.

    I have no doubt heroin and other physically addictive drugs are very dangerous to use. But I do think there are people who use any substance well and wisely. For that reason alone we should give our intial respect and a presumption of good character to any particular drug user unless and until we determine that this person is in fact consciously harming themself.

    Besides, we all have tobacco smoking and drinking friends (you also have many, many pot-smoking friends if you live anywhere near San Francisco). I personally think most tobacco use is kinda stupid, but it’s ridiculous to claim there exist no tobacco users who are also good persons. Given that tobacco is about the most dangerous drug in existence, it makes sense to act likewise with cocaine, meth, or heroin users.

    People generally see only the ugliest and most incompetent drug use because most drug users with any sense are fairly good at concealing themselves. Why don’t we all try to get to know our local drug users? And drug dealers? You might be surprised what dark, mysterious people are really like once you get to know them yourself.

· August 2006 ·

  1. Ace

    It reeks of left-winged hippies in here.

    Rest in peace Lauren… Gone but not forgotten.

    *Psych. was fun

Post a reply

By:
Your e-mail address will not be published.
You can register for an account and sign in to verify your identity and avoid spam traps.
Reply

Use Markdown syntax for formatting. *emphasis* = emphasis, **strong** = strong, [link](http://xyz.com) = link,
> block quote to quote blocks of text.

This form is for public comments. Consult About: Comments for policies and copyright details.

Anticopyright. This was written 2006–2008 by Rad Geek. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.