How many market anarchists does it take to change a lightbulb?
Here's a pretty old post from the blog archives of Geekery Today; it was written about 14 years ago, in 2011, on the World Wide Web.
In a freed market, without patent restrictions, government electrical cartels, or state capitalist infrastructure subsidies, the lightbulbs would be free to organize and change themselves.
Follow
(Somewhat inspired by the recent appearance of a somewhat mangled version of the Crimethinc lightbulb joke at /r/Anarchism.)
I always heard the anarcho-capitalist one as, “None; If the lightbulb needs changing, the market will do it.”
Anon,
I’ve heard that one in a number of variations (ancaps, libertarians, economists, etc.). I don’t find that one very funny. Not because it’s completely inaccurate as a jab (there are at least some people it’s accurate for), but because I usually find these things funnier when they try to imitate how the targets actually talk, rather than just ridiculing them from the outside.
In that vein, for economist jokes, I tend to prefer:
Q. Three neoclassical economists are stranded on a desert island with a can of chili, a coconut tree, a fishing hook and some driftwood. How do they survive?
A. First, assume a can opener….
Q. How many Austrian economists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A. We don’t make quantitative predictions.
Anon, I’ve heard that as: “How many libertarians does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, the free market will take care of it!”
Six. Two to endlessly debate whether the lightbulb is a beneficiary of state subsidies, one who says that the lightbulb doesn’t really exist and if we ignore it we’ll be able to see, one to become a Republican, one to gradually establish a new lightbulb within the socket of the old, and one to call him a statist.
I don’t think I would screw in a lightbulb. I might be willing to try, but the things look pretty cramped.