Rad Geek People's Daily

official state media for a secessionist republic of one

Reading: The Dating of Plato’s Ion, John D. Moore (1974)

John D. Moore (1974), “The Dating of Plato’s Ion”

Attached Media

THE SMALL DIALOGUE called Ion has provoked more than its share of bewilderment, embarrassment and outrage. ... Ast and Ritter pronounced it spurious, as did Wilamowitz for many years. When Wilamowitz ultimately changed his mind, he still judged it a poor and puzzling piece of work, an intolerant satire more than a dialogue. He found Socrates' lecturing inconsistent with the question-and-answer technique of the early dialogues; he considered it the earliest of the dialogues, one of three written during Socrates' lifetime. Plato's intolerance towards poetry resulted then from his recent conversion by Socrates from poetry to philosophy.
application/pdf

THE SMALL DIALOGUE called Ion has provoked more than its share of bewilderment, embarrassment and outrage. … Ast and Ritter pronounced it spurious, as did Wilamowitz for many years. When Wilamowitz ultimately changed his mind, he still judged it a poor and puzzling piece of work, an intolerant satire more than a dialogue. He found Socrates’ lecturing inconsistent with the question-and-answer technique of the early dialogues; he considered it the earliest of the dialogues, one of three written during Socrates’ lifetime. Plato’s intolerance towards poetry resulted then from his recent conversion by Socrates from poetry to philosophy.

Reply to John D. Moore (1974), “The Dating of Plato’s Ion” Use a feed to Follow replies to this article

Post a reply

By:
Your e-mail address will not be published.
You can register for an account and sign in to verify your identity and avoid spam traps.
Reply

Use Markdown syntax for formatting. *emphasis* = emphasis, **strong** = strong, [link](http://xyz.com) = link,
> block quote to quote blocks of text.

This form is for public comments. Consult About: Comments for policies and copyright details.