Rad Geek People's Daily

official state media for a secessionist republic of one

Monday Lazy Linking

    <ul>
<li><p><a href="http://www.saidit.org/archives/jun06/language.html">Said It - Little Women, Big Men: Sexism and the Language of Size - Volume 4, Number 2. <cite>www.saidit.org</cite> (2010-12-12)</a>. <q>... there is one area of language that feminists have ignored entirely: the metaphorical "language of size." Language of size refers here to the vast collection of commonly used metaphors that associate -- regardless of subject matter -- whatever is positive with "big," and whatever is negative with "small." For...</q> <em style="font-size: smaller">(Linked Sunday 2010-12-12.)</em></p></li>
<li><p><a href="http://marjaerwin.livejournal.com/20821.html">Wilsonian Progressivism is far too close to Fascism. <cite>Marja Erwin</cite> (2010-12-10)</a>. <q>I don't get why anyone who identify as liberals or as leftist would identify with Wilsonian Progressivism. Let's look at his legacy:1. Intervention in the First World War.2. The Espionage and Sedition Acts.3. Militant support for segregation.4. The First Red Scare.I think Naomi Wolf's new column shows how these are...</q> <em style="font-size: smaller">(Linked Sunday 2010-12-12.)</em></p></li>
<li><p><a href="http://mises.org/daily/4844">Harry Truman: Advancing the Revolution. <cite>Mises Institute Daily Articles (Full-text version)</cite> (2010-11-16)</a>. <q>Truman's predecessor had vastly expanded federal power, especially the power of the president, in what amounted to a revolution in American government. Under Truman, that revolution was consolidated and advanced beyond what even Franklin Roosevelt had ever dared hope for.</q> <em style="font-size: smaller">(Linked Sunday 2010-12-12.)</em></p></li>

Advertisement

Help me get rid of these Google ads with a gift of $10.00 towards this month’s operating expenses for radgeek.com. See Donate for details.

Anticopyright. This was written in 2010 by Rad Geek. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.