Rad Geek People's Daily

official state media for a secessionist republic of one

One-way mirror

Here's a pretty old post from the blog archives of Geekery Today; it was written about 15 years ago, in 2009, on the World Wide Web.

(Quote thanks to Sheldon Richman 2009-04-10: Bad Regulation Drives Out Good.)

Here is Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) — who informs us that in conflicts between Wall Street and Main Street, he sides with Main Street and always has — expounding on the governing party’s new notion of transparency in hyperregulatory bailout capitalism:

We are working on major financial reform…. You're gonna find a different system of regulation. The real problem—and this is government's fault ...—when the financial world changed, the system of regulation didn't.... That will change. There will be a strong, quiet, hopefully more unified federal regulator.... And he's gonna be tough–or she. But they're gonna be quiet. So like when Bear Stearns began to run into trouble, they're gonna call the heads of Bear Stearns in and say, All right fellas, you're getting rid of those two hedge funds; you're gonna raise more capital—even if means you have lower profitability. We're not gonna tell anyone you're doing this, but you do it or we're gonna take sanctions against you. ... You don’t need a lot of voices, yelling, because that just weakens the institution. You need a tough, strong regulator, unified—no holes in the system— ... who ... sees the problem ahead of time, so they have complete transparency, they know exactly what's going on ... and they come in and say straighten up even if your ... profitability is lower and your stock has to go down.

— Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), Morning Joe (2009-04-06), MSNBC. Transcript available.

Normally, in politics, transparency is used to refer to norms and processes that allow ordinary people to find out what government or other large institutions are doing with their money or how those institutions are making the decisions that affect their lives. For Charles Schumer, transparency in government regulatory agencies apparently means that government regulators will have complete access to information about everybody else’s business — and will call in the heads of large financial institutions to a secret meeting, behind closed doors, where they will make secret decisions, behind closed doors, which they will force on institutions whose decisions affect millions of people, which will be forced to comply with special requirements and subsidized with special government deals, which both the government and those institutions will deliberately conceal from the public, with the explicit purpose of preserving the economic status quo, and frustrating any effort by ordinary folks to find out what the hell the government is doing on their dime and supposedly in their names. Under Schumerian transparency, government regulators will know everything about what’s going on, and they will conspire with big bankers to make sure that you know nothing.

For Schumer, transparency is a one-way mirror — like the kind you see on TV cop shows. Guess which side the prisoner is on.

See also:

7 replies to One-way mirror Use a feed to Follow replies to this article · TrackBack URI

  1. Bob Kaercher

    Jeez, is Schumer taking pointers from The Sopranos now?

  2. Sheldon Richman

    Excellent points! And thanks for the plug.

  3. Rad Geek


    Thanks! And you’re more than welcome.


    They all do.

  4. Darren

    Great article. Please read “How Dare You Want To Know What “Your” Government Is Doing!” (http://www.nolanchart.com/article6279.html) for reinforcement.

  5. Darren

    My progressive friends at link=OpEdNews.com accepted a link to your article.

  6. Rmangum

    I have never heard of Schumer’s name associated with anything good, so when I heard some months back that he was against nationalizing the banks, I thought to myself, “Shit, maybe we ought to nationalize the banks.” Now I can see why. Chuck wants to play the tough-guy “regulator” telling the Wall Street fat-cats what to do, without the burden of any actual financial success or failure or accountability from the public.

    Anybody who wants to see a dramatic example of what a whopping prickoid Chuck Schumer can be should watch the documentary “Waco: the Rules of Engagement” where he mercilessly berates victims of ATF violence.

    He reminds me of another deathless Washington ghoul from my own state (on the other side of the aisle, but what’s the diff), Orrin Hatch.

· May 2009 ·

  1. Discussed at radgeek.com

    Rad Geek People’s Daily 2009-05-06 – Wednesday Lazy Linking:

    […] one-way mirror transparency (+): Jesse Walker, Hit & Run (2009-04-23): In Bailouts End […]

Post a reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.
You can register for an account and sign in to verify your identity and avoid spam traps.

Use Markdown syntax for formatting. *emphasis* = emphasis, **strong** = strong, [link](http://xyz.com) = link,
> block quote to quote blocks of text.

This form is for public comments. Consult About: Comments for policies and copyright details.

Anticopyright. This was written in 2009 by Rad Geek. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.