Rad Geek People's Daily

official state media for a secessionist republic of one

Posts filed under Lazy Linking

Re: Salad vs. Big Mac

Salad vs. Big Mac. Shakesville (2010-03-27):

Via Economix; created by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.If you can’t view the image, it’s a graphic labeled “Why Does a Salad Cost More Than a Big Mac?” featuring two pyramids. The one on the left is labeled “Federal Subsidies for Food Production, 1995-2005,” and it shows the breakdown…

Why does a salad cost more than a Big Mac?

Because government subsidizes some agribusiness more than others.

The market for food in a freed society would look nothing like the rigged industrial meat market that we have today.

Re: Charges Against Pete Eyre Dismissed

Charges Against Pete Eyre Dismissed. the Motorhome Diaries (2010-03-26):

In the continuing Jones County saga, this past Monday the charges against me were dismissed. Yay! Much thanks goes to our very awesome and very thorough legal team. More on this from the Laurel Leader-Call. Just a reminder: it wasn't myself, Jason or Adam who acted in the wrong on…

Congratulations to Pete. Next up: freeing Jason and Adam.

Friday Lazy Linking

Re: ‘They’re Cops; They’re Going to Beat You’

You got served and protected. (Cont’d.)[1]

!!!@@e2;20ac;2dc;They're Cops; They're Going to Beat You' LewRockwell.com Blog (2010-03-25):

When the victim of a criminal assault dials 911 for help, what happens if police are the assailants? Chicago residents [M.C.] (a Ph.D. lecturer at the University of Chicago) and [G.M.] (who is finishing his Ph.D.) can answer that question: The cops who respond to the call will…

Keep in mind that when a gang of blue-bangers starts beating on you in a public place in front of God and everyone, you’re still better off not calling 911: if you do, they’ll only send reinforcements.

  1. [1]Edited (2017-05-04): at the request of one of the crime victims mentioned in this story, the names of the students victimized by police have been redacted to initials. –C.J.

Re: Google Alleges That Viacom ‘Secretly Uploaded Its Content to YouTube, Even While Publicly Complaining About Its Presence There’

Google Alleges That Viacom !!!@@e2;20ac;2dc;Secretly Uploaded Its Content to YouTube, Even While Publicly Complaining About Its Presence There' Daring Fireball (2010-03-25):

Zahavah Levine, chief counsel for YouTube in its litigation with Viacom: For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its content to YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site. It deliberately "roughed up"…

“For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its contentto YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site.” You could read this as a story about the hypocrisy and unmitigated gall of the copyright monopolists. I prefer to read it as a story about how a flourishing countereconomy gives even the aggressive sort of ideological statists a positive incentive to work towards promoting the free world in practice. Not even a massive copyright monopolist like Viacom can afford to abstain from the anti-copyright countereconomy. Not because they agree with it politically, but for reasons of business, pure and simple.

Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2024 by Rad Geek. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.